Showing posts with label gossamer sycamores. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gossamer sycamores. Show all posts

2/5/09

Blank Dullaghan

The way I see it, there are three ways to pick a name for your kid. You may have others, but we narrowed it down thusly:

People. You can choose the name of some historical figure you admire. I thought of Marie Curie right away, but then remembered that she died prematurely of radiation poisoning as a result of her scientific studies. Joan of Arc sprang to mind next, but she met an early end as well. Rosalind Franklin, same, and Helen Keller, well, not exactly, but hers was still not the life most of us would wish for our daughters. (Funny, though, that we have no problem imagining our*selves* in the great and tortured lives of history's heroes — I, for one, would be honored to have been named after Abraham Lincoln — yet we hesitate to sentence our *kids* to those folks' fates.) In the end, I concluded that heroes aren't such a bright place to start after all. I'd like a nice, peaceful, happy existence for our little one, and it's hard to get too famous doing that.

Ideas. You can go by meanings, and choose from names that are said to equal the traits and experiences you envision for your offspring. I went with "happiness," since that was the quality I found lacking in the historical figures, and came back with "Gay" (naturally), "Gioconda," "Manuia," "Yue," "Takwesha," "Farrukh," "Felicia" and "Dedwydd." All are said to have meanings equal or similar to the concept of happiness, and would accordingly bode well for little Ms. Dullaghan. But still. "Takwesha"? "Dullaghan"?

Words. There are certain words in the English language, and in others of course, that are just plain pretty, regardless of their meaning, and those might be good inspiration for the word you're bound to repeat thousands of times over the next several decades. "Sycamore," for one, has been declared by a noted poet to be the most intrinsically beautiful word in our language, and I suppose that's hard to argue with. Tolkien was in love with "cellar door," which does roll off the tongue quite nicely, and I've heard cases made for the beauty of the words "Beautiful," "Bobolink," "Halcyon," "Gossamer" and "Gonnorhea." Ah, no. Mellifluous, yes, but I'm not calling my daughter a venereal disease. It sets a bad precedent.

So that leaves the simple process of elimination, which is slow going. Any baby book on the market will array for you some 10,000 potential names for your child of either gender, and just going from A to Z with a highlighter gets really boring, really quickly. Most sound bad with "Dullaghan," let me tell you right now, and before long "Ava" starts to sound a lot like "Emma," and "Anna," and so forth. You circle several on the first few pages and realize you'll still have hundreds to choose from by the time you get done, which may not be until the kid is in high school.

It'd be great if you could get to know the child and choose something that reflects her personality, but there's the rub: you have to name her before you know her. And you have to live with the possibility — some would say certainty — that your choice will come to *define* her personality as she grows up. So you'd better pick something you not only won't mind hearing yourself say, but watching your daughter *be.* No pressure.

Fortunately, Lope has had some great ideas, possibly because she had better methods of deciding than mine, and we've got it narrowed down to a couple now.

We'll let you know how it turns out. I can tell you this much, though: it's not gonna be Takwesha.